Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Spiritual Well-Being and Dyadic Adjustment: Mediator Effects for Family Strengths

Majid Ghaffari 1 , *
Author Information
1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanity and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences: September 2016, 10 (3); e1699
  • Published Online: August 7, 2016
  • Article Type: Original Article
  • Received: July 21, 2015
  • Revised: September 18, 2015
  • Accepted: July 18, 2016
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijpbs-1699

To Cite: Ghaffari M. Spiritual Well-Being and Dyadic Adjustment: Mediator Effects for Family Strengths, Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2016 ; 10(3):e1699. doi: 10.17795/ijpbs-1699.

Copyright © 2016, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Schumm WR. Beyond relationship characteristics of strong families: Constructing a model of family strengths. Fam Pers. 1985; 19(1): 1-9
  • 2. Schumm WR, Bollman SR, Jurich AP, Hatch RC. Family strengths and the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale: a factor analytic study. Psychol Rep. 2001; 88(3 Pt 2): 965-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Wheeler T. Investigating the interrelationships among various measures of family strengths [Dissertation]. 2008;
  • 4. Stinnett N. Strengthening families. Fam Pers. 1979; 13(1): 3-9
  • 5. Ghaffari M, Fatehizade M, Ahmadi A, Ghasemi V, Baghban I. Predictors of family strength: the integrated spiritual-religious/resilient perspective for understanding the healthy/strong family. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2013; 7(2): 57-67[PubMed]
  • 6. Kay AC, Gaucher D, McGregor I, Nash K. Religious belief as compensatory control. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010; 14(1): 37-48[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Park CL. Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136(2): 257-301[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Varner JES. Effects of spiritual well-being, religious coping, and hardiness on parenting behaviors in low socioeconomic status families [Dissertation]. 2009;
  • 9. Moberg DO, Brusek PM. Spiritual well-being: A neglected subject in quality of life research. Soc Indicat Res. 1978; 5(1-4): 303-23[DOI]
  • 10. Schwartz AL. Marital quality, acculturation, and communication in Mexican American couples [Dissertation]. 2012;
  • 11. Lewis R, Spanier G. Theorizing about the Quality and Stability of Marriage. Contemporary Theories about the Family: Research-based theories. 1979;
  • 12. Isanezhad O, Ahmadi SA, Bahrami F, Baghban I, Farajzadegan Z, Etemadi O. Factor structure and reliability of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) in Iranian population. Iran J Psychi Behav Scien. 2013; 6: 55-61
  • 13. Isanezhad O, Ahmadi SA, Etemadi O. Effectiveness of relationship enhancement on marital quality of couples [in Persian]. Int J Behav Sci. 2010; 4(1): 9-16
  • 14. Busby DM, Christensen C, Crane DR, Larson JH. A Revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for Use with Distressed and Nondistressed Couples: Construct Hierarchy and Multidimensional Scales. J Marital Fam Ther. 1995; 21(3): 289-308[DOI]
  • 15. Wong S, Goodwin R. Experiencing marital satisfaction across three cultures: A qualitative study. J Soci Person Relation. 2009; 26(8): 1011-28[DOI]
  • 16. Cronbach LJ. Essentials of psychological testing. 1970;
  • 17. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. 1994;
  • 18. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models. 1993; : 136-62
  • 19. Steiger JH. Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behav Res. 1990; 25(2): 173-80[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Evaluating model fit. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. 1995; : 76-99
  • 21. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 1998;
  • 22. Ullman JB. Structural equation modeling. Using Multivariate Statistics. 2001; : 653-771
  • 23. Paloutzian RF, Ellison CW. Loneliness, spiritual well-being and quality of life. Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. 1982; : 224-37
  • 24. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. 2010;
  • 25. Ghasemi V. Structural equation modeling in social researches using Amos Graphics [in Persian]. 2010;
  • 26. Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Commun Monographs. 2009; 76(4): 408-20[DOI]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments