Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Spiritual Well-Being and Dyadic Adjustment: Mediator Effects for Family Strengths

Majid Ghaffari 1 , *
Author Information
1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanity and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences: September 2016, 10 (3); e1699
  • Published Online: August 7, 2016
  • Article Type: Original Article
  • Received: July 21, 2015
  • Revised: September 18, 2015
  • Accepted: July 18, 2016
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijpbs-1699

To Cite: Ghaffari M. Spiritual Well-Being and Dyadic Adjustment: Mediator Effects for Family Strengths, Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2016 ;10(3):e1699. doi: 10.17795/ijpbs-1699.

Abstract
Copyright: Copyright © 2016, Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Schumm WR. Beyond relationship characteristics of strong families: Constructing a model of family strengths. Fam Pers. 1985; 19(1): 1-9
  • 2. Schumm WR, Bollman SR, Jurich AP, Hatch RC. Family strengths and the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale: a factor analytic study. Psychol Rep. 2001; 88(3 Pt 2): 965-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Wheeler T. Investigating the interrelationships among various measures of family strengths [Dissertation]. 2008;
  • 4. Stinnett N. Strengthening families. Fam Pers. 1979; 13(1): 3-9
  • 5. Ghaffari M, Fatehizade M, Ahmadi A, Ghasemi V, Baghban I. Predictors of family strength: the integrated spiritual-religious/resilient perspective for understanding the healthy/strong family. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2013; 7(2): 57-67[PubMed]
  • 6. Kay AC, Gaucher D, McGregor I, Nash K. Religious belief as compensatory control. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010; 14(1): 37-48[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Park CL. Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136(2): 257-301[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Varner JES. Effects of spiritual well-being, religious coping, and hardiness on parenting behaviors in low socioeconomic status families [Dissertation]. 2009;
  • 9. Moberg DO, Brusek PM. Spiritual well-being: A neglected subject in quality of life research. Soc Indicat Res. 1978; 5(1-4): 303-23[DOI]
  • 10. Schwartz AL. Marital quality, acculturation, and communication in Mexican American couples [Dissertation]. 2012;
  • 11. Lewis R, Spanier G. Theorizing about the Quality and Stability of Marriage. Contemporary Theories about the Family: Research-based theories. 1979;
  • 12. Isanezhad O, Ahmadi SA, Bahrami F, Baghban I, Farajzadegan Z, Etemadi O. Factor structure and reliability of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) in Iranian population. Iran J Psychi Behav Scien. 2013; 6: 55-61
  • 13. Isanezhad O, Ahmadi SA, Etemadi O. Effectiveness of relationship enhancement on marital quality of couples [in Persian]. Int J Behav Sci. 2010; 4(1): 9-16
  • 14. Busby DM, Christensen C, Crane DR, Larson JH. A Revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for Use with Distressed and Nondistressed Couples: Construct Hierarchy and Multidimensional Scales. J Marital Fam Ther. 1995; 21(3): 289-308[DOI]
  • 15. Wong S, Goodwin R. Experiencing marital satisfaction across three cultures: A qualitative study. J Soci Person Relation. 2009; 26(8): 1011-28[DOI]
  • 16. Cronbach LJ. Essentials of psychological testing. 1970;
  • 17. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. 1994;
  • 18. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models. 1993; : 136-62
  • 19. Steiger JH. Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behav Res. 1990; 25(2): 173-80[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Evaluating model fit. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. 1995; : 76-99
  • 21. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 1998;
  • 22. Ullman JB. Structural equation modeling. Using Multivariate Statistics. 2001; : 653-771
  • 23. Paloutzian RF, Ellison CW. Loneliness, spiritual well-being and quality of life. Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. 1982; : 224-37
  • 24. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. 2010;
  • 25. Ghasemi V. Structural equation modeling in social researches using Amos Graphics [in Persian]. 2010;
  • 26. Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Commun Monographs. 2009; 76(4): 408-20[DOI]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .