Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Comparing the Effects of Self-Controlled and Examiner-Controlled Feedback on Learning in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder

Mohamad Hosein Zamani 1 , Rouholah Fatemi 2 , * and Keyvan Soroushmoghadam 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Sport Psychology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, IR Iran
2 Department of Neurophysiology, Physiology Research Center (PRC), Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran
3 Department of Physical Education, Payame Noor University, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences: December 28, 2015, 9 (4); e2422
  • Published Online: December 23, 2015
  • Article Type: Original Article
  • Received: March 21, 2015
  • Revised: August 18, 2015
  • Accepted: October 10, 2015
  • DOI: 10.17795/ijpbs-2422

To Cite: Zamani M H, Fatemi R, Soroushmoghadam K. Comparing the Effects of Self-Controlled and Examiner-Controlled Feedback on Learning in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder, Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2015 ; 9(4):e2422. doi: 10.17795/ijpbs-2422.

Copyright © 2015, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Geuze RH. Postural control in children with developmental coordination disorder. Neural Plast. 2005; 12(2-3): 183-96[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Wuang YP, Su JH, Su CY. Reliability and responsiveness of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition Test in children with developmental coordination disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012; 54(2): 160-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Hillier S, McIntyre A, Plummer L. Aquatic physical therapy for children with developmental coordination disorder: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2010; 30(2): 111-24
  • 4. Albaret JM, Chaix Y. [Neurobiological bases and neurophysiological correlates of developmental coordination disorders]. Neurophysiol Clin. 2012; 42(1-2): 11-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Hong CS. Assessment for and provision of positioning equipment for children with motor impairments. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2005; 12(3): 126-31
  • 6. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: Text revision. Washington; American Psychiatric Association. 2000;
  • 7. Kadesjo B, Gillberg C. Developmental coordination disorder in Swedish 7-year-old children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999; 38(7): 820-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Rice MS, Hernandez HG. Frequency of knowledge of results and motor learning in persons with developmental delay. Occup Ther Int. 2006; 13(1): 35-48[PubMed]
  • 9. Wiliston OH, Martin S, Holly G. The effect Knowledge of frequency feedback on motor skill learning developmental delay in a group of 16 people. OccupTher. 2006; (3): 35-48
  • 10. Locke EA, Latham GP. A theory of goal setting & task performance. 1990;
  • 11. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol Bull. 1982; 92(1): 111-35[PubMed]
  • 12. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organiz Behav Human Decision Proc. 1991; 50(2): 248-87
  • 13. Earley PC, Northcraft GB, Lee C, Lituchy TR. Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance. Acad Manag J. 1990; 33(1): 87-105
  • 14. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996; 119(2): 254
  • 15. Chen D. Trends in augmented feedback and tips for the practitioner. J Phys Educ. 2001; 1: 32-6
  • 16. Bruechert L, Lai Q, Shea CH. Reduced knowledge of results frequency enhances error detection. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003; 74(4): 467-72[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002; 73(4): 408-15[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Janelle CM, Kim J, Singer RN. Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Percept Mot Skills. 1995; 81(2): 627-34[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Wulf G, Toole T. Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999; 70(3): 265-72[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Chiviacowsky S, Godinho M, Tani G. Self-controlled knowledge of results: Effects of different schedules and task complexity. J Human Move Stud. 2005; 49(4): 277-96
  • 21. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, de Medeiros FL, Kaefer A, Wally R. Self-controlled feedback in 10-year-old children: higher feedback frequencies enhance learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008; 79(1): 122-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Hemayattalab R, Arabameri E, Pourazar M, Ardakani MD, Kashefi M. Effects of self-controlled feedback on learning of a throwing task in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013; 34(9): 2884-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Coolidge FL, Thede LL, Stewart SE, Segal DL. The coolidge personality and neuropsychological inventory for children (CPNI). Preliminary psychometric characteristics. Behav Modif. 2002; 26(4): 550-66[PubMed]
  • 24. Young DE, Schmidt RA. Augmented Kinematic Feedback for Motor Learning. J Mot Behav. 1992; 24(3): 261-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 25. Thomas JR, Yan JH, Stelmach GE. Movement substructures change as a function of practice in children and adults. J Exp Child Psychol. 2000; 75(3): 228-44[DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983; 46(6): 521-4[PubMed]
  • 27. Wulf G, Schmidt RA. Average KR degrades parameter learning. J Mot Behav. 1996; 28(4): 371-81[PubMed]
  • 28. Barclay CR, Newell KM. Children's processing of information in motor skill acquisition. J Exp Child Psychol. 1980; 30(1): 98-108[PubMed]
  • 29. Wulf G, Clauss A, Shea CH, Whitacre CA. Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001; 72(3): 299-303[DOI][PubMed]
  • 30. Wulf G, Raupach M, Pfeiffer F. Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005; 76(1): 107-11[DOI][PubMed]
  • 31. Butki BD, Hoffman SJ. Effects of reducing frequency of intrinsic knowledge of results on the learning of a motor skill. Percept Mot Skills. 2003; 97(2): 569-80[DOI][PubMed]
  • 32. Ferrari M. Observing the Observer: Self-Regulation in the Observational Learning of Motor Skills. Dev Rev. 1996; 16(2): 203-40[DOI]
  • 33. McNevin NH, Wulf G, Carlson C. Effects of attentional focus, self-control, and dyad training on motor learning: implications for physical rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2000; 80(4): 373-85[PubMed]
  • 34. Smith RA, Lee T. Motor control and learning: a behavioural emphasis 1998;
  • 35. Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SG, Tennant LK, Cauraugh JH. Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997; 68(4): 269-79[DOI][PubMed]
  • 36. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, de Medeiros FL, Kaefer A, Tani G. Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008; 79(3): 405-10
  • 37. Wulf G, McConnel N, Gartner M, Schwarz A. Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. J Mot Behav. 2002; 34(2): 171-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 38. Wulf G, Shea CH. Understanding the role of augmented feedback:Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice. 2004;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments