Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Revised Implicit Theories of Intelligence (Self-Theory) Scale in High School Students

Majid Ghaffari 1 , * , Avishan Omidmehr 1 , Elham Yavari 1 and Mahmood Dehqan 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Psychology, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
2 Department of English Language and Literature , University of Mazandaran , Babolsar, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences: September 2018, 12 (3); e57497
  • Published Online: July 22, 2018
  • Article Type: Original Article
  • Received: July 3, 2017
  • Revised: July 24, 2017
  • Accepted: November 8, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijpbs.57497

To Cite: Ghaffari M, Omidmehr A, Yavari E, Dehqan M. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Revised Implicit Theories of Intelligence (Self-Theory) Scale in High School Students, Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2018 ; 12(3):e57497. doi: 10.5812/ijpbs.57497.

Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. 5. 2006. p. 307-37.
  • 2. Elliott ES, Dweck CS. Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(1):5-12. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5.
  • 3. Dweck C. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press; 1999.
  • 4. Blackwell LS, Trzesniewski KH, Dweck CS. Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Dev. 2007;78(1):246-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x. [PubMed: 17328703].
  • 5. Rhodewalt F. Conceptions of Ability, Achievement Goals, and Individual Differences in Self-Handicapping Behavior: On the Application of Implicit Theories. J Pers. 1994;62(1):67-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00795.x.
  • 6. De Castella K, Byrne D. My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: the revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2015;30(3):245-67. doi: 10.1007/s10212-015-0244-y.
  • 7. Froehlich L, Martiny SE, Deaux K, Goetz T, Mok SY. Being smart or getting smarter: Implicit theory of intelligence moderates stereotype threat and stereotype lift effects. Br J Soc Psychol. 2016;55(3):564-87. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12144. [PubMed: 27117190].
  • 8. Schroder HS, Fisher ME, Lin Y, Lo SL, Danovitch JH, Moser JS. Neural evidence for enhanced attention to mistakes among school-aged children with a growth mindset. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017;24:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.004. [PubMed: 28131929].
  • 9. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
  • 10. El-Nawawy AA, Abd El-Fattah MM, Metwally HA, Barakat SS, Hassan IA. One year study of bacterial and fungal nosocomial infections among patients in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in Alexandria. J Trop Pediatr. 2006;52(3):185-91. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi091. [PubMed: 16186137].
  • 11. Dweck C. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books; 2006.
  • 12. Mohebbi Nour-El-Dinvand MH, Shehni Yeylagh M, Sharifi H. Investigating the psychometric properties of Implicit Theories of Intelligence Scale (ITIS) in a student society. Educ Meas. 2013;4(14):43-64.
  • 13. Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing. 13. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2000.
  • 14. Bentler P. Comparative fit indices in structural models. PsychBull. 1990;107:238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
  • 15. Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 3rd ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996.
  • 16. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2010.
  • 17. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993. p. 136-62.
  • 18. Ullman JB. Structural equation modeling. In: Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, editors. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2001. p. 653-771.
  • 19. Karkkainen R, Raty H, Kasanen K. Children’s notions of the malleability of their academic competencies. Soc Psychol Educ. 2008;11(4):445-58. doi: 10.1007/s11218-008-9062-2.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments