Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Revised Implicit Theories of Intelligence (Self-Theory) Scale in High School Students

Majid Ghaffari 1 , * , Avishan Omidmehr 1 , Elham Yavari 1 and Mahmood Dehqan 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Psychology, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
2 Department of English Language and Literature , University of Mazandaran , Babolsar, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences: September 2018, 12 (3); e57497
  • Published Online: July 22, 2018
  • Article Type: Original Article
  • Received: July 3, 2017
  • Revised: July 24, 2017
  • Accepted: November 8, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijpbs.57497

To Cite: Ghaffari M, Omidmehr A, Yavari E, Dehqan M. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Revised Implicit Theories of Intelligence (Self-Theory) Scale in High School Students, Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2018 ; 12(3):e57497. doi: 10.5812/ijpbs.57497.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. 5. 2006. p. 307-37.
  • 2. Elliott ES, Dweck CS. Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(1):5-12. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5.
  • 3. Dweck C. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press; 1999.
  • 4. Blackwell LS, Trzesniewski KH, Dweck CS. Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Dev. 2007;78(1):246-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x. [PubMed: 17328703].
  • 5. Rhodewalt F. Conceptions of Ability, Achievement Goals, and Individual Differences in Self-Handicapping Behavior: On the Application of Implicit Theories. J Pers. 1994;62(1):67-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00795.x.
  • 6. De Castella K, Byrne D. My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: the revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2015;30(3):245-67. doi: 10.1007/s10212-015-0244-y.
  • 7. Froehlich L, Martiny SE, Deaux K, Goetz T, Mok SY. Being smart or getting smarter: Implicit theory of intelligence moderates stereotype threat and stereotype lift effects. Br J Soc Psychol. 2016;55(3):564-87. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12144. [PubMed: 27117190].
  • 8. Schroder HS, Fisher ME, Lin Y, Lo SL, Danovitch JH, Moser JS. Neural evidence for enhanced attention to mistakes among school-aged children with a growth mindset. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017;24:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.004. [PubMed: 28131929].
  • 9. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
  • 10. El-Nawawy AA, Abd El-Fattah MM, Metwally HA, Barakat SS, Hassan IA. One year study of bacterial and fungal nosocomial infections among patients in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in Alexandria. J Trop Pediatr. 2006;52(3):185-91. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi091. [PubMed: 16186137].
  • 11. Dweck C. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books; 2006.
  • 12. Mohebbi Nour-El-Dinvand MH, Shehni Yeylagh M, Sharifi H. Investigating the psychometric properties of Implicit Theories of Intelligence Scale (ITIS) in a student society. Educ Meas. 2013;4(14):43-64.
  • 13. Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing. 13. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2000.
  • 14. Bentler P. Comparative fit indices in structural models. PsychBull. 1990;107:238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
  • 15. Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 3rd ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996.
  • 16. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2010.
  • 17. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993. p. 136-62.
  • 18. Ullman JB. Structural equation modeling. In: Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, editors. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2001. p. 653-771.
  • 19. Karkkainen R, Raty H, Kasanen K. Children’s notions of the malleability of their academic competencies. Soc Psychol Educ. 2008;11(4):445-58. doi: 10.1007/s11218-008-9062-2.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments