Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

How Gender, Majors, Religion and Mental Health Affect the Justified Death Attitude?

Pouya Zandian 1 , Mojtaba Habibi 2 , Zahra Seydi 3 , Benyamin Kleman 4 , Nasrin Tayeri 5 , Noban Fashandi 6 and Seyed Vahid Shariat 7 , *
Authors Information
1 Cognitive Psychologist, Clinical Psychologist, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Addiction studies, Tehran Institute of Psychiatry, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
4 Family Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, G. C., Tehran, Iran
5 Cognitive Psychologist, Tehran, Iran
6 Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University of West Tehran, Tehran, Iran
7 Mental Health Research Center, Tehran Institute of Psychiatry- School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences: December 2017, 11 (4); e7700
  • Published Online: March 7, 2017
  • Article Type: Original Article
  • Received: June 28, 2016
  • Revised: December 4, 2016
  • Accepted: February 17, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijpbs.7700

To Cite: Zandian P, Habibi M, Seydi Z, Kleman B, Tayeri N, et al. How Gender, Majors, Religion and Mental Health Affect the Justified Death Attitude?, Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2017 ;11(4):e7700. doi: 10.5812/ijpbs.7700.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Zandian P, Habibi M, Shariat SV, Tayeri N. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Justified Death Attitude Scale. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2016;10(4). e3217. doi: 10.17795/ijpbs-3217.
  • 2. Bohm RM, Vogel BL. More than ten years after: The long-term stability of informed death penalty opinions. J Crim Justice. 2004;32(4):307-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.04.003.
  • 3. Lee C. Hispanics and the death penalty: Discriminatory charging practices in San Joaquin County, California. J Crim Justice. 2007;35(1):17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.11.012.
  • 4. Wozniak KH, Lewis AR. Reexamining the effect of christian denominational affiliation on death penalty support. J Crim Justice. 2010;38(5):1082-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.011.
  • 5. Cochran JK, Sanders BA. The gender gap in death penalty support: An exploratory study. J Crim Justice. 2009;37(6):525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.09.001.
  • 6. Jiang S, Lambert EG, Wang J, Saito T, Pilot R. Death penalty views in China, Japan and the U.S.: An empirical comparison. J. Crim. Justice. 2010;38(5):862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.001.
  • 7. Lu H, Zhang L. Death penalty in China: The law and the practice. J Crim Justice. 2005;33(4):367-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.04.006.
  • 8. Watson PJ, Ross DF, Morris RJ. Borderline personality traits correlate with death penalty decisions. Pers Individ Dif. 2003;35(2):421-9. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00204-0.
  • 9. Blackmore S. Consciousness: an introduction. Oxford University Press; 2011.
  • 10. Van Hooff AJL. Ancient euthanasia: ‘good death’ and the doctor in the graeco-Roman world. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(5):975-85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.036.
  • 11. Parpa E, Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Sakkas P, Patiraki E, Pistevou-Gombaki K, et al. Attitudes of health care professionals, relatives of advanced cancer patients and public towards euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. Health Policy. 2010;97(2-3):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.008. [PubMed: 20488575].
  • 12. Berghs M, Dierckx de Casterle B, Gastmans C. Practices of responsibility and nurses during the euthanasia programs of Nazi Germany: a discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(5):845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.05.003. [PubMed: 16824527].
  • 13. Van Wesemael Y, Cohen J, Bilsen J, Smets T, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Deliens L. Process and outcomes of euthanasia requests under the belgian act on euthanasia: a nationwide survey. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;42(5):721-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.02.011. [PubMed: 21570807].
  • 14. Habibi M, Zandian P, Hadi Pour H, Abedini S. Can the five-factor model adequately represent the quality-of-life in cancerous patients?. Int J Educ Psychol Res. 2015;1(2):96-9. doi: 10.4103/2395-2296.152221.
  • 15. Cohen J, Marcoux I, Bilsen J, Deboosere P, van der Wal G, Deliens L. European public acceptance of euthanasia: socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(3):743-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.026. [PubMed: 16537097].
  • 16. Montazeri A, Harirchi AM, Shariati M, Garmaroudi G, Ebadi M, Fateh A. The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-66. [PubMed: 14614778].
  • 17. Aghababaei N. Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: the role of altruism. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(3):173-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101004. [PubMed: 23365467].
  • 18. Aghababaei N, Farahani H, Hatami J. Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2011;4:9. [PubMed: 23908751].
  • 19. Zarghami M, Valaie N, Ahmadi Sartakhti A, Mehraban M, Mahmoudi R, Sheikh Moonesi F. Attitudes of iranian interns and residents towards euthanasia. World Appl Sci J. 2010;8(4):486-9.
  • 20. Lemiengre J, Dierckx de Casterle B, Verbeke G, Van Craen K, Schotsmans P, Gastmans C. Ethics policies on euthanasia in nursing homes: a survey in Flanders, Belgium. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(2):376-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.007. [PubMed: 17996349].
  • 21. Reeve CL, Rogelberg SG, Spitzmuller C, Digiacomo N. The Caring-Killing Paradox: Euthanasia-Related Strain Among Animal-Shelter Workers1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;35(1):119-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02096.x.
  • 22. van Tol DG, Rietjens JA, van der Heide A. Empathy and the application of the 'unbearable suffering' criterion in Dutch euthanasia practice. Health Policy. 2012;105(2-3):296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.01.014. [PubMed: 22417862].
  • 23. Gaertner L, Sedikides C, Luke M, O'Mara EM, Iuzzini J, Jackson LE, et al. A motivational hierarchy within: Primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self?. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012;48(5):997-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.009.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments