Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Published by: Kowsar

How Gender, Majors, Religion and Mental Health Affect the Justified Death Attitude?

Pouya Zandian 1 , Mojtaba Habibi 2 , Zahra Seydi 3 , Benyamin Kleman 4 , Nasrin Tayeri 5 , Noban Fashandi 6 and Seyed Vahid Shariat 7 , *
Authors Information
1 Cognitive Psychologist, Clinical Psychologist, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Addiction studies, Tehran Institute of Psychiatry, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
4 Family Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, G. C., Tehran, Iran
5 Cognitive Psychologist, Tehran, Iran
6 Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University of West Tehran, Tehran, Iran
7 Mental Health Research Center, Tehran Institute of Psychiatry- School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences: December 2017, 11 (4); e7700
  • Published Online: March 7, 2017
  • Article Type: Original Article
  • Received: June 28, 2016
  • Revised: December 4, 2016
  • Accepted: February 17, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijpbs.7700

To Cite: Zandian P, Habibi M, Seydi Z, Kleman B, Tayeri N, et al. How Gender, Majors, Religion and Mental Health Affect the Justified Death Attitude?, Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2017 ;11(4):e7700. doi: 10.5812/ijpbs.7700.

Copyright: Copyright © 2017, Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Zandian P, Habibi M, Shariat SV, Tayeri N. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Justified Death Attitude Scale. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2016;10(4). e3217. doi: 10.17795/ijpbs-3217.
  • 2. Bohm RM, Vogel BL. More than ten years after: The long-term stability of informed death penalty opinions. J Crim Justice. 2004;32(4):307-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.04.003.
  • 3. Lee C. Hispanics and the death penalty: Discriminatory charging practices in San Joaquin County, California. J Crim Justice. 2007;35(1):17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.11.012.
  • 4. Wozniak KH, Lewis AR. Reexamining the effect of christian denominational affiliation on death penalty support. J Crim Justice. 2010;38(5):1082-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.011.
  • 5. Cochran JK, Sanders BA. The gender gap in death penalty support: An exploratory study. J Crim Justice. 2009;37(6):525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.09.001.
  • 6. Jiang S, Lambert EG, Wang J, Saito T, Pilot R. Death penalty views in China, Japan and the U.S.: An empirical comparison. J. Crim. Justice. 2010;38(5):862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.001.
  • 7. Lu H, Zhang L. Death penalty in China: The law and the practice. J Crim Justice. 2005;33(4):367-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.04.006.
  • 8. Watson PJ, Ross DF, Morris RJ. Borderline personality traits correlate with death penalty decisions. Pers Individ Dif. 2003;35(2):421-9. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00204-0.
  • 9. Blackmore S. Consciousness: an introduction. Oxford University Press; 2011.
  • 10. Van Hooff AJL. Ancient euthanasia: ‘good death’ and the doctor in the graeco-Roman world. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(5):975-85. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.036.
  • 11. Parpa E, Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Sakkas P, Patiraki E, Pistevou-Gombaki K, et al. Attitudes of health care professionals, relatives of advanced cancer patients and public towards euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. Health Policy. 2010;97(2-3):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.008. [PubMed: 20488575].
  • 12. Berghs M, Dierckx de Casterle B, Gastmans C. Practices of responsibility and nurses during the euthanasia programs of Nazi Germany: a discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(5):845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.05.003. [PubMed: 16824527].
  • 13. Van Wesemael Y, Cohen J, Bilsen J, Smets T, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Deliens L. Process and outcomes of euthanasia requests under the belgian act on euthanasia: a nationwide survey. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;42(5):721-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.02.011. [PubMed: 21570807].
  • 14. Habibi M, Zandian P, Hadi Pour H, Abedini S. Can the five-factor model adequately represent the quality-of-life in cancerous patients?. Int J Educ Psychol Res. 2015;1(2):96-9. doi: 10.4103/2395-2296.152221.
  • 15. Cohen J, Marcoux I, Bilsen J, Deboosere P, van der Wal G, Deliens L. European public acceptance of euthanasia: socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(3):743-56. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.026. [PubMed: 16537097].
  • 16. Montazeri A, Harirchi AM, Shariati M, Garmaroudi G, Ebadi M, Fateh A. The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-66. [PubMed: 14614778].
  • 17. Aghababaei N. Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: the role of altruism. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(3):173-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101004. [PubMed: 23365467].
  • 18. Aghababaei N, Farahani H, Hatami J. Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2011;4:9. [PubMed: 23908751].
  • 19. Zarghami M, Valaie N, Ahmadi Sartakhti A, Mehraban M, Mahmoudi R, Sheikh Moonesi F. Attitudes of iranian interns and residents towards euthanasia. World Appl Sci J. 2010;8(4):486-9.
  • 20. Lemiengre J, Dierckx de Casterle B, Verbeke G, Van Craen K, Schotsmans P, Gastmans C. Ethics policies on euthanasia in nursing homes: a survey in Flanders, Belgium. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(2):376-86. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.007. [PubMed: 17996349].
  • 21. Reeve CL, Rogelberg SG, Spitzmuller C, Digiacomo N. The Caring-Killing Paradox: Euthanasia-Related Strain Among Animal-Shelter Workers1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;35(1):119-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02096.x.
  • 22. van Tol DG, Rietjens JA, van der Heide A. Empathy and the application of the 'unbearable suffering' criterion in Dutch euthanasia practice. Health Policy. 2012;105(2-3):296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.01.014. [PubMed: 22417862].
  • 23. Gaertner L, Sedikides C, Luke M, O'Mara EM, Iuzzini J, Jackson LE, et al. A motivational hierarchy within: Primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self?. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012;48(5):997-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.009.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader